Books 10/19/05

There are a lot of movies that I feel compelled to see the day they come out, but for some reason that doesn’t really transfer over to books. There are really only a few that I feel a vital need to possess and read the instant they come out. The Harry Potter books are one, because they’re one of the very few things in life that I don’t want spoilers for, but if it wasn’t for everyone talking about them I could probably wait. In fact, with this last one I had to, and I survived just fine. The other is Lemony Snicket’s A Series of Unfortunate Events. I really have no fear of them being spoiled because the stories are so winding that I don’t know that you could “spoil” them, I just have to have them right away because I absolutely adore them and can’t wait for more. I’m lucky in that I read most of the series all in one big chunk, and didn’t have to wait years between volumes, but volume 12, The Penultimate Peril, came out yesterday, and I’ve been going crazy for it since I finished volume 11 ages ago. I went out and got it and read it yesterday, and now I can’t wait for volume 13, the final book in the series.

Have I mentioned that I adore these books? I do. I compared them, in an earlier review, to sour candy– delightfully unpleasant and addicting, and I stand by that description. As the books have gone on, however, there’s a deeper theme at work than just good kids in an unfortunate situation. The children are learning through all their trials that the people who are out to do good in the world are those appreciate and value literature, art, music, and science; that reading makes you a better thinker, a better human being. Their adventures always seem to take them to libraries, where they find answers to help them through their troubles. The bad guys are those who blindly (and hilariously) follow fads, who think books are trash, who have no references of any kind in their heads, and who blindly follow rather than thinking for themselves.

Snicket has been clear in interviews and things that one of his purposes in the books was to show that good things don’t happen to you just because you’re good. Bad things happen to good people, and it’s how you choose to handle that that determines who you really are. But he’s also developing something further- that the line between good and bad isn’t always clear. Noble people don’t always do the right thing, and you can’t always rely on people, no matter how noble they may be. The children are forced to confront that conflict within themselves in this book- if you do something horrible, even if it’s an accident, does that make you a horrible person? At what point does the end no longer justify the means?

As with the other books in the series, volume 12 has some great creations, including The Hotel Denoument that’s organized by the Dewey decimal system, and designed with all the lettering on the outside backwards so that it’s reflection in the lake out front is right way round. Many characters from previous installments appear in this volume, but there’s a reason for it, and the ending is so suprising that I can not wait for the next volume. I know it will be a long wait, but I can’t wait to see how he concludes everything and ties it all together; and I can’t wait to finally find out what’s in the sugar bowl!

There’s a beautiful moment in all the madness of the book that I have to share here, for those of you batty enough not to be reading these books. I’m hopefully not violating some copyright, if I am, I’m super sorry. In any rate- this next part is copyright Lemony Snicket.

“I’m not sure we are noble,” Klaus said quietly, flipping the pages of his commonplace book. “We caused those accidents at the lumbermill. We’re responsible for the destruction of the hospital. We helped start the fire that destroyed Madame Lulu’s archival library We-”

“Enough,” Dewey interrupted gently, putting a hand on Klaus’ shoulder. “You’re noble enough, Baudelaires. That’s all we can ask for in this world.”

The middle Baudelaire hung his head, so he was leaning against the sub-sub-librarian and his sisters huddled against him, and all four volunteers stood for a moment in the dark. Tears fell from the eyes of the orphans- all four of them- and, as with many tears shed at night, they could not have said exactly why they were crying, although I know why I am crying as I type this, and it is not because of the onions that someone is slicing in the next room or because of the wretched curry he is planning on making with them. I am crying because Dewey Denouement was wrong. He was not wrong when he said the Baudelaires were noble enough, although I suppose many people might argue about such a thing, if they were sitting around a room together without a deck of cards or something good to read. Dewey was wrong when he said that being noble enough is all we can ask for in this world, because we can ask for much more than that. We can ask for a second helping of pound cake, even though someone has made it quite clear that we will not get any. We can ask for a new watercolor set, even though it will be pointed out that we never used the old one, and that all of the paints dried into a crumbly mess. We can ask for Japanese fighting fish, to keep us company in our bedroom, and we can ask for a special camera that will allow us to take photographs even in the dark, for obvious reasons, and we can ask for an extra sugar cube in our coffees in the morning and an extra pillow in our beds at night. We can ask for justice, and we can ask for a handkerchief, and we can ask for cupcakes, and we can ask for all the soldiers in the world to lay down their weapons and join us in a rousing chorus of “Cry Me A River”, if that happens to be your favorite song. But we can also ask for something we are much more likely to get, and that is to find a person or two, somewhere in our travels, who will tell us that we are noble enough, whether it is true or not. We can ask for someone who will say “You are noble enough,” and remind us of our good qualities when we have forgotten them, or cast them into doubt.

That’s why I love these books, and why I’ll be reading them to my kids, just as soon as I have some and they’re old enough to understand them on even the basest level. And why I’ll be going quietly mad until the next one comes out.

Current total: 81
Just finished: The Penultimate Peril by Lemony Snicket
Next Up: who can say?

Books 10/13/05

I’ve been reading lots of Agatha Christie over the last couple of days, trying to get my brain to start thinking in the mystery genre. I think perhaps it’s starting to work. In an attempt to pay attention to how she structures the clues and so forth, I picked a variety of titles, some I’d read before, some I’d seen a film version of, and some I knew nothing about. I tried to avoid short stories, as I’m not going to be writing a short story, but ended up with a collection by mistake. But it was one I’d never read before and was quite different than her other work, so I enjoyed it. These are the books, in the order I read them.

Death on the Nile – I thought I’d read this previously, but now I don’t think I had. I have seen the movie version a kabillion times though.
Evil Under the Sun – I’ve both read and seen a film version of this one. I read it first in 8th grade, I remember everything about where I was when I read the first bit vividly.
The Murder on the Links – I knew nothing about this one going in.
Nemesis – I read this one ages ago as well, but didn’t remember what happened until I got part way in. Then it all came back. It’s actually one of my favorites.
The Sittaford Mystery – I didn’t know anything about this one either. I was a bit concerned as it deals somewhat with Spiritualism and a strange house, and I was worried that Ms. Agatha had already written my book, but mine will be quite different.
The Mysterious Mr. Quin- This is the short story collection. It’s different than her other books in that the reoccuring character is an ethereal embodiment of Harlequin, the protector of lovers. All of the stories center on lovers being wrongly seperated or persecuted, and Mr. Quin appears in the nick of time to help the very human Mr. Satterthwaite solve the mystery and make everything ok. Kind of a hokey plot device, but the mysteries are good, and the story Harlequin’s Lane was poignant and heartbreaking.

What have I learned from all of these? It’s all about distraction. Throw enough secrets about and you can keep the truth shrouded until the end. I’ve also learned that I have to make the suspects really distinct, or it gets really easy to confuse them. And the last thing I learned? I read mysteries far faster than I read non-fiction books on spiritualism or the 1920s.

I have a couple more books to go before the binge is over- The Pale Horse and Black Coffee. I’m a bit hesitant on Black Coffee, as it’s not actually written by Agatha Christie, I think it’s a Hercule Poirot story that was on the TV series and then novelized by someone else. I didn’t notice that when I picked it up at the library. Well, I’ll give it a chance and see how it goes.

Current total: 80
Just Finished: The Mysterious Mr. Quin by Agatha Christie
Next Up: The Pale Horse by Agatha Christie

Books 10/8/05

I finally settled in and finished Witches of Eastwick. I’ve read it before, and I’m sure I’ll read it again, it’s just one of those books. I know I’ve written about it in previous years, but I don’t feel like going back to see what I wrote, so if I repeat myself, then oh well.

The book is very different from the movie- the three witches aren’t all young and nubile, and Darryl Van Horne isn’t blatantly the devil. The witches all have powers and recognize themselves as such long before Van Horne comes into town, and rather than awaken and empower their… powers, he pushes them to go bigger and bigger until they fold under the weight of their ambition. Where the movie has the character of Felicia acting as a kind of prophet fortelling doom after her accident, the Felicia of the book is just a petty, self-righteous woman; which makes the witches actions against her more sad, as their judgemental nature is so realistic. I think that’s really the point of the book- witchcraft stands for the power each woman can hold within herself once she really knows herself, and the narrative shows how easily that power can be manipulated by someone else if you let them, and how easily women turn against other women who have a different outlook or opinion.

The last half of the book takes the story in a completely different direction than the movie, with the witches being displaced by a new girl in town. Their revenge on her and its results are actually quite suprising.

I know I have a huge stack of books that I should read for research purposes (NaNoWriMo here I come!), but I’m just not feeling in the mood for non-fiction. So, I think I’m heading over to the library to take my research in a different direction– Agatha Christie, here I come. Maybe I’ll find something of hers I haven’t read, maybe I’ll re-read, but going to the Mistress of Murder can only help my technique. I hope.

Current total: 74
Just Finished: Witches of Eastwick by John Updike
Next Up: Something Marple

Books 10/6/05

I finished two books a while back and have been floating from book to book in the meantime. So, I should catch up.

The Spiritualists by Ruth Brandon concerns the Spiritualist movement, beginning with it’s conception in 1848 and taking it through the 1930s. The Spiritualist movement is fascinating to me, because it’s such a study in human psychology. As this book puts forth, the “founders” of the movement were frauds (I put founders in quotation marks because the little girls who began it all didn’t really set out to found anything), and those who had positions of prominence and renown within the Spiritualist world all later admitted that they too were frauds, yet lots and lots of people believed them, even after they came out as con men (or women). People were so desperate to believe that these people could talk to the dead that they would overlook and explain away the most blantant forgery. And many of them even convinced themselves that they had spiritualistic abilities of their own. Scientists who came in to investigate either allowed their own belief to sway their findings, or, if they were strictly scientific in their approach, were dismissed as antagonistic. If people who didn’t believe came to a seance and nothing happened to convince them of the validity of the medium, that could always be explained away as them bringing in a disruptive force that kept the spirits away.

The book covers both what the spiritualists claimed they could do, and the reality of what they were doing. The tricks that they pulled were quite impressive, and testify to the tendency of the human mind to see what it wants to see. Moving tables, taps, ghostly apparitions, and even ectoplasm are described, by people who witnessed them, in well documented excerpts from original records, and then analyzed and explained. When the feats were debunked by scientists, or were later explained by the spiritualists themselves, their accounts are likewise included.

The book is a great overview of the Spiritualist movement during its heyday. Of course, this kind of belief still continues today, and it’s interesting to see how spiritualists today (though I doubt they’d choose that title) present the same phenomenon.

I also read Architectural Follies by Gwyn Headley. Apparently a folly is an actual architectural term, the meaning of which is still a little unclear to me, even after finishing the book. It seems to be related to buildings that are strange and slightly (or very) outrageous, but that’s not always enough to make it a folly. Sometimes they’re just super expensive and unfinished, or not used for their original purpose. Or not.

Anyway, I got the book because it had a section on the Winchester Mystery House, and man, was it short and disappointing. (We’re talking 2 pages, each with a picture on the bottom half of the page.) It only covered the basic history of the house, with little to no discussion of the actual architecture or structure of the house, which is what I was looking for. That’s really the experience I had with most of the book- many fascinating buildings and structures were touched on, but just touched on. More pictures would have been nice, and more than just a teaser on each building would have been much appreciated. I don’t mind finishing a book and feeling inspired to do tangental research, but when I feel the need to research everything in the book then I don’t know that the book did its job.

Now I’m floating from book to book, not seemingly able to settle on any one in particular. I have a bunch of books about life in the 1920s to read, as well a couple more about specific Spiritualists, and I can’t decide where to land. I’m also partway through The Blessing by Nancy Mitford and The Witches of Eastwick… I need to just focus and finish something!

Current Total: 73
Just finished: Architectural Follies by Gwyn Headley
Currently reading: oh who knows?